Free Speech Union on comments by Race Relations Commissioner Dr Melissa Derby on Q+A

06 October 2025
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Free Speech Union on comments by Race Relations Commissioner Dr Melissa Derby on Q+A

The Free Speech Union were concerned about comments made by Race Relations Commissioner Dr Melissa Derby on Q+A on the weekend so reached out to the Commissioner for clarification.

Dr Derby was one of the founding members of the Free Speech Union and has a long track record of advocating for robust and respectful public debate. Her comments appeared inconsistent with the principles of the Union, but we have since spoken directly with Dr Derby and are satisfied that her position remains firmly opposed to any form of blasphemy or ‘hate speech’ law that would limit legitimate criticism or discussion.

Dr Derby has clarified that she believes “freedom of expression is a fundamental human right” and “allows us the right to peacefully protest and to exchange ideas.” She noted that “there is a difference between criticising a religion or ideology, and calling for violence or the death of people who adhere to that ideology… The latter is never okay against any group in this country.”

During the interview, some of the questioning blurred key distinctions between “incitement” and “hate speech,” and also traversed matters outside the Commissioner’s direct remit. 

Dr Derby has long advocated for improved education in how Kiwis can engage in respectful political discourse and disagreement, rather than relying on punitive or legal measures to police speech. This aligns with the Free Speech Union’s belief that the best antidote to bad ideas is better debate, not censorship.

“Freedom of expression is one of the most important rights in a democracy,” says Free Speech Union CEO Jillaine Heather. “We exist to protect the rights of Kiwis to exercise those rights, and we oppose any suggestion of ‘hate speech’ or blasphemy laws. We are pleased that Dr Derby shares our conviction that New Zealand must foster a culture of open debate where disagreement is met with dialogue, not punishment.”